The following are moody posts from this thread, in which authors express emotions..
 Re: now I got it (More from this Author) 2010-03-10 09:56:50 [Replies: 60, Views: 1] Now I got it (I think) 1. You are fond of many words to explain simple concepts 2. You use preview and/or review and adjust until you think it looks good. And - you use your experience to compensa..
Re: You could try to be less roundabout (More from this Author) 2010-03-10 19:21:50 [Replies: 91, Views: 1] Hey! I think you will be surprised at how similar we are What you tell - done there been there. I am also all for new and better technology tools. The LCD and the possibility to preview and/or rev..
Re: now I got it (More from this Author) 2010-03-10 20:28:59 [Replies: 113, Views: 1] Roland Karlsson wrote: > > sdyue wrote: > > preview only never review. > > I have two cameras that I often use that can do preview. > > Canon G10. Your method works just fine..
 Re: What's an exposure meter for? (More from this Author) 2010-03-10 20:28:59 [Replies: 113, Views: 1] > > > To me at 200 shadows are too closed and hard to use. > Couldn't that problem be solved in the raw converter some day? Plugging the shadows happens in raw not much room for a r..
Re: What's an exposure meter for? (More from this Author) 2010-03-11 10:52:44 [Replies: 139, Views: 1] Iliah Borg wrote: > I do not want to go into such double interpolation games. ;) Seems you don't like sandwiches ..
| 
